Missing Sister or Implanted Memory?


Direct Link to BrightCove [1556197684]

That’s the question that I’m left asking after watching this sneak peak of Echo arguing with FBI Agent Paul Smith over her “missing sister”. We know that the “actives” are ‘volunteers’ in the Dollhouse programme - at least that’s what we’re led to assume. Which means that they all had lives before they became ‘pure souls’. This begs the question of whether Echo really does have a sister who went missing before she became an active (was this the reason for her ‘volunteering’ to become an active - to forget the pain of losing her sister?)..or whether Echo has been implanted with ‘false memory’ by her employers in order to throw Paul Smith (who is on the hunt of this secret Dollhouse) off the scent..

It’s an interesting scene and is sure to lead to rabid speculation by fans the closer we get to January (are we there yet?). Hopefully FOX will be so kind and release more ’sneak peeks’ like this one over the coming months.

Share This Post

Related posts:

  1. SPOILER: Echo, Her Sister & Agent Smith The youcantdownloadit blog have a script review of the Dollhouse Pilot,...
  2. New Dollhouse Sneak Peak! The Underwire Blog has a brand new clip of Dollhouse....
  3. SPOILERS: Dollhouse Pilot Sides - 1.01 “GHOST” It was bound to happen..it happened last time, and it's...
  4. Spoilers: Echo, Victor + Smith Episode 2 Details A few weeks ago casting slides containing spoilers for the...
  5. How Spoiled Is Dollhouse? Charlie Jane Anders over at io9 believes that Joss...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

2 Responses to “ Missing Sister or Implanted Memory? ”

  1. [...] You can view the sneak peak of Echo in a tense encounter with Agent Smith here. [...]

  2. [...] a haven for spoiler information, although there are a few major spoilers relating to the snippet that FOX released a couple of months [...]

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>