<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official: Dollhouse Season 2 Cast Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/</link>
	<description>Fansite &#38; Forum for Joss Whedon's Dollhouse FOX TV Series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Me too!  I&#039;m so glad Dollhouse gets a second season!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too!  I&#8217;m so glad Dollhouse gets a second season!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>Oh, I really do agree -- the philosophical/moral issues presented in &quot;Dollhouse&quot; are one of the main reasons that I watch it, and Joss Whedon is certainly smart and smart-ass enough to play off of society&#039;s expectations just to make a statement.

I suppose I particularly get irritated about the clothing issue because I tend to feel that there are more ways to get the point across. But that&#039;s just my personal opinion. Either way, I really can&#039;t wait for the second season to come on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I really do agree &#8212; the philosophical/moral issues presented in &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; are one of the main reasons that I watch it, and Joss Whedon is certainly smart and smart-ass enough to play off of society&#8217;s expectations just to make a statement.</p>
<p>I suppose I particularly get irritated about the clothing issue because I tend to feel that there are more ways to get the point across. But that&#8217;s just my personal opinion. Either way, I really can&#8217;t wait for the second season to come on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>I agree that FOX (and a lot of television in general) attempts to sell their shows with sex and that this can distract from the full meaning of any show.  Also, unfortunately so, I think that this is a large draw for much of the general population.  For this show in particular (not singling out any episodes), I came to believe that the skimpy outfits reflected society&#039;s obsession with the surface, and Joss presented the idea that  there is more to a person than how &quot;slutty&quot; they look on day to day basis.  Although I still believe that many of Echo&#039;s outfits fit well for the engagements, I agree that wearing too little clothing can be classless.  Perhaps I&#039;m rationalizing the wardrobe because I know that there are deeper, and in my opinion, more important messages presented in the show and I don’t want the clothing to ruin that for me.  I think we have similar opinions, just slightly different observations.  Do you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that FOX (and a lot of television in general) attempts to sell their shows with sex and that this can distract from the full meaning of any show.  Also, unfortunately so, I think that this is a large draw for much of the general population.  For this show in particular (not singling out any episodes), I came to believe that the skimpy outfits reflected society&#8217;s obsession with the surface, and Joss presented the idea that  there is more to a person than how &#8220;slutty&#8221; they look on day to day basis.  Although I still believe that many of Echo&#8217;s outfits fit well for the engagements, I agree that wearing too little clothing can be classless.  Perhaps I&#8217;m rationalizing the wardrobe because I know that there are deeper, and in my opinion, more important messages presented in the show and I don’t want the clothing to ruin that for me.  I think we have similar opinions, just slightly different observations.  Do you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s certainly a fair observation, but there were certain times that the clothing just sort of distracted (for instance the go-go gear she wore throughout &quot;Echoes&quot; -- I know that it&#039;s explained by the engagement she walked away from, but I found the slutty-schoolgirl look a negative distraction). For me, I guess I think that there are some cases where it&#039;s almost classless to have so few clothes on. And even in the promos -- like the remote-free TV thing, where it just panned over a naked Echo with running lights covering her privates. I don&#039;t know; it just felt like the packaging, while not entirely, seemed to lean toward FOX&#039;s seeming determination lately to sell everything with sex, even when sex isn&#039;t what the show is focused on.

Although the dominatrix garb and the ensuing conversation (I forget which episode that was in) was actually very revealing of Echo&#039;s handler, I found. Maybe I just saw it differently than you did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s certainly a fair observation, but there were certain times that the clothing just sort of distracted (for instance the go-go gear she wore throughout &#8220;Echoes&#8221; &#8212; I know that it&#8217;s explained by the engagement she walked away from, but I found the slutty-schoolgirl look a negative distraction). For me, I guess I think that there are some cases where it&#8217;s almost classless to have so few clothes on. And even in the promos &#8212; like the remote-free TV thing, where it just panned over a naked Echo with running lights covering her privates. I don&#8217;t know; it just felt like the packaging, while not entirely, seemed to lean toward FOX&#8217;s seeming determination lately to sell everything with sex, even when sex isn&#8217;t what the show is focused on.</p>
<p>Although the dominatrix garb and the ensuing conversation (I forget which episode that was in) was actually very revealing of Echo&#8217;s handler, I found. Maybe I just saw it differently than you did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Hmm... In the first season, I saw a lot of interesting dilemmas with newfound technology and profound implications concerning its interaction with human nature as well as individual personalities.  Echo&#039;s clothing seems to have always fit the engagement for which she was hired.  It&#039;s interesting that you focused on only one subset of that character&#039;s presentation.  Everything we say is a projection from which others can determine what we think about ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; In the first season, I saw a lot of interesting dilemmas with newfound technology and profound implications concerning its interaction with human nature as well as individual personalities.  Echo&#8217;s clothing seems to have always fit the engagement for which she was hired.  It&#8217;s interesting that you focused on only one subset of that character&#8217;s presentation.  Everything we say is a projection from which others can determine what we think about ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Oh, my -- yet more photos of Eliza Dushku fully clothed! I&#039;m starting to have high hopes that this season will actually focus more on the action and the plot than the &quot;see Echo in the SlutWear fashion line&quot; angle that they were so obsessed with last season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, my &#8212; yet more photos of Eliza Dushku fully clothed! I&#8217;m starting to have high hopes that this season will actually focus more on the action and the plot than the &#8220;see Echo in the SlutWear fashion line&#8221; angle that they were so obsessed with last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>I like the first three.  Is there symbolism to the ones after that?  I don&#039;t see the point of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first three.  Is there symbolism to the ones after that?  I don&#8217;t see the point of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
