Comments on: Official: Dollhouse Season 2 Cast Photos http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/ Fansite & Forum for Joss Whedon's Dollhouse FOX TV Series Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:28:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: axarzvsd http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-20478 axarzvsd Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:54:14 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-20478 FsxN1o <a href="http://eunvyqjhgeyc.com/" rel="nofollow">eunvyqjhgeyc</a> FsxN1o eunvyqjhgeyc

]]> By: Miguel http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-20266 Miguel Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:21:23 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-20266 I’m over Dollhouse. I just don’t think Dushku has what it takes to be a ledniag lady. And you’re right, the show is missing the trademark Whedon-isms. Oh, they try (the quote, “Oh my god! You guys are going to get married and have a bunch of scowly babies” was HI-lariouis) but the show just seems to fall short compared to past Whendon creations. I’m over Dollhouse. I just don’t think Dushku has what it takes to be a ledniag lady. And you’re right, the show is missing the trademark Whedon-isms. Oh, they try (the quote, “Oh my god! You guys are going to get married and have a bunch of scowly babies” was HI-lariouis) but the show just seems to fall short compared to past Whendon creations.

]]> By: udpjlua http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-2113 udpjlua Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:03:56 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-2113 zJdNh7 <a href="http://qtsqnwmbgbme.com/" rel="nofollow">qtsqnwmbgbme</a> zJdNh7 qtsqnwmbgbme

]]> By: Carlye http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-2110 Carlye Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:00:29 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-2110 If your acrtlies are always this helpful, ?I'll be back.? If your acrtlies are always this helpful, ?I’ll be back.?

]]> By: lying tiger http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1957 lying tiger Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:51:28 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1957 Doll House had NO chance. This series has terrifying implications to the coherent mind. Conceptually, Doll House (especially Season 2) is a nightmare of a potential future reality. But don't worry. With all of the technological abuses accelerating...we won't make at as far, as Doll House did. Joss & his staff of writers are conceptual, intellectual anomalies, beyond the current tier of geniuses. There are conceptual layers of intellect & latent emotional depths to Doll House that would elude and confuse our brightest think tanks. Doll House had NO chance. This series has terrifying implications to the coherent mind.

Conceptually, Doll House (especially Season 2) is a nightmare of a potential future reality. But don't worry. With all of the technological abuses accelerating…we won't make at as far, as Doll House did.

Joss & his staff of writers are conceptual, intellectual anomalies, beyond the current tier of geniuses. There are conceptual layers of intellect & latent emotional depths to Doll House that would elude and confuse our brightest think tanks.

]]> By: Brandon http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1779 Brandon Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:16:49 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1779 Me too! I'm so glad Dollhouse gets a second season! Me too! I’m so glad Dollhouse gets a second season!

]]> By: Phoenix http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1778 Phoenix Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:02:54 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1778 Oh, I really do agree -- the philosophical/moral issues presented in "Dollhouse" are one of the main reasons that I watch it, and Joss Whedon is certainly smart and smart-ass enough to play off of society's expectations just to make a statement. I suppose I particularly get irritated about the clothing issue because I tend to feel that there are more ways to get the point across. But that's just my personal opinion. Either way, I really can't wait for the second season to come on! Oh, I really do agree — the philosophical/moral issues presented in “Dollhouse” are one of the main reasons that I watch it, and Joss Whedon is certainly smart and smart-ass enough to play off of society’s expectations just to make a statement.

I suppose I particularly get irritated about the clothing issue because I tend to feel that there are more ways to get the point across. But that’s just my personal opinion. Either way, I really can’t wait for the second season to come on!

]]> By: Brandon http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1777 Brandon Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:19:46 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1777 I agree that FOX (and a lot of television in general) attempts to sell their shows with sex and that this can distract from the full meaning of any show. Also, unfortunately so, I think that this is a large draw for much of the general population. For this show in particular (not singling out any episodes), I came to believe that the skimpy outfits reflected society's obsession with the surface, and Joss presented the idea that there is more to a person than how "slutty" they look on day to day basis. Although I still believe that many of Echo's outfits fit well for the engagements, I agree that wearing too little clothing can be classless. Perhaps I'm rationalizing the wardrobe because I know that there are deeper, and in my opinion, more important messages presented in the show and I don’t want the clothing to ruin that for me. I think we have similar opinions, just slightly different observations. Do you agree? I agree that FOX (and a lot of television in general) attempts to sell their shows with sex and that this can distract from the full meaning of any show. Also, unfortunately so, I think that this is a large draw for much of the general population. For this show in particular (not singling out any episodes), I came to believe that the skimpy outfits reflected society’s obsession with the surface, and Joss presented the idea that there is more to a person than how “slutty” they look on day to day basis. Although I still believe that many of Echo’s outfits fit well for the engagements, I agree that wearing too little clothing can be classless. Perhaps I’m rationalizing the wardrobe because I know that there are deeper, and in my opinion, more important messages presented in the show and I don’t want the clothing to ruin that for me. I think we have similar opinions, just slightly different observations. Do you agree?

]]> By: Phoenix http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1776 Phoenix Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:57:24 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1776 I think that's certainly a fair observation, but there were certain times that the clothing just sort of distracted (for instance the go-go gear she wore throughout "Echoes" -- I know that it's explained by the engagement she walked away from, but I found the slutty-schoolgirl look a negative distraction). For me, I guess I think that there are some cases where it's almost classless to have so few clothes on. And even in the promos -- like the remote-free TV thing, where it just panned over a naked Echo with running lights covering her privates. I don't know; it just felt like the packaging, while not entirely, seemed to lean toward FOX's seeming determination lately to sell everything with sex, even when sex isn't what the show is focused on. Although the dominatrix garb and the ensuing conversation (I forget which episode that was in) was actually very revealing of Echo's handler, I found. Maybe I just saw it differently than you did? I think that’s certainly a fair observation, but there were certain times that the clothing just sort of distracted (for instance the go-go gear she wore throughout “Echoes” — I know that it’s explained by the engagement she walked away from, but I found the slutty-schoolgirl look a negative distraction). For me, I guess I think that there are some cases where it’s almost classless to have so few clothes on. And even in the promos — like the remote-free TV thing, where it just panned over a naked Echo with running lights covering her privates. I don’t know; it just felt like the packaging, while not entirely, seemed to lean toward FOX’s seeming determination lately to sell everything with sex, even when sex isn’t what the show is focused on.

Although the dominatrix garb and the ensuing conversation (I forget which episode that was in) was actually very revealing of Echo’s handler, I found. Maybe I just saw it differently than you did?

]]> By: Brandon http://watchingdollhouse.com/official-dollhouse-season-2-cast-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1775 Brandon Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:09:17 +0000 http://watchingdollhouse.com/?p=2102#comment-1775 Hmm... In the first season, I saw a lot of interesting dilemmas with newfound technology and profound implications concerning its interaction with human nature as well as individual personalities. Echo's clothing seems to have always fit the engagement for which she was hired. It's interesting that you focused on only one subset of that character's presentation. Everything we say is a projection from which others can determine what we think about ourselves. Hmm… In the first season, I saw a lot of interesting dilemmas with newfound technology and profound implications concerning its interaction with human nature as well as individual personalities. Echo's clothing seems to have always fit the engagement for which she was hired. It's interesting that you focused on only one subset of that character's presentation. Everything we say is a projection from which others can determine what we think about ourselves.

]]>