FOX has released a new video of Dollhouse mastermind Joss Whedon and actress/producer Eliza Dushku talking about their upcoming show. I gotta say, I love the new tag-line: “Who Do You Want Me To Be?”. Check it out below:

Also, you may have noticed that there’s now a Gallery on the site – feel free to check it out (it’s still in the early stages, mind).

{ 2 comments }

Never Let Me Go by Kazuo IshiguroIn this interview with IGN, Joss Whedon made reference to the novel Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro. I want to highlight this because Whedon seemed pleased that actor Tahmoh Pinekett found parallels between the novel and the early Dollhouse script.

I admit, I have never read the book, but I’ve since done a bit of researching and I can see Penikett’s point – the novel does share potential themes with what we know about Dollhouse – just replace the clone angle with the notion of “Actives”. For those of you who like to do your background reading on possible inspirations or connections to the Dollhouse premise,  here’s a brief synopsis of Never Let Me Go (obviously, novel spoilers ahead):

Set in a (barely?) alternate England in the late 1990s, Never Let Me Go is the sum of Kathy’s memories. Kathy is one of many “donors” who have been brought into being for purposes that, while well-intended, can come to no good. Ishiguro’s novel touches on the issues surrounding human cloning and identity and “what if.” Then again, human clones are nothing new. Know any identical twins? They may be clones of one another, but that doesn’t preclude them from having discrete selves. Never Let Me Go doesn’t put science on trial; rather, it takes humans to task on the willful, too-prevalent misuse and misunderstanding of science to further parochial, sad ends.

More:

From the Booker Prize-winning author of The Remains of the Day and When We Were Orphans, comes an unforgettable edge-of-your-seat mystery that is at once heartbreakingly tender and morally courageous about what it means to be human. 

Hailsham seems like a pleasant English boarding school, far from the influences of the city. Its students are well tended and supported, trained in art and literature, and become just the sort of people the world wants them to be. But, curiously, they are taught nothing of the outside world and are allowed little contact with it.

 

Within the grounds of Hailsham, Kathy grows from schoolgirl to young woman, but it’s only when she and her friends Ruth and Tommy leave the safe grounds of the school (as they always knew they would) that they realize the full truth of what Hailsham is.

 

 

Never Let Me Go breaks through the boundaries of the literary novel. It is a gripping mystery, a beautiful love story, and also a scathing critique of human arrogance and a moral examination of how we treat the vulnerable and different in our society. In exploring the themes of memory and the impact of the past, Ishiguro takes on the idea of a possible future to create his most moving and powerful book to date.

So we have themes of ‘memory’, ‘identity’, ’secret organisations’ and ’conditioning’ to name just a few of the potential parallels between this intriguing novel and Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse. Frankly, I’m fascinated by this book, just as I am Whedon’s Dollhouse – there is an underlying quality about a premise which is ultimately about the characters. Yes, the scifi-global conspiracy fancy stuff is great, but without great characters then you’re struggling. Both the Never Let Me Go and Dollhouseappear’ to adopt that focus.

Something I’ve been wondering since hearing about Dollhouse concerns the social and human questions that Whedon is trying to provoke through Dollhouse? After all, most writers write because they want to speak to the world (or someone) through their work, no? One aspect I’m already considering is the question of: Do memories define us, or are we defined by the potential to be whoever we want to be? And what of the tools (science) that facilitate progression – can it be regulated? should it be regulated? Who has the knowledge to really decide?

As I said, I haven’t yet read the book and obviously I haven’t yet seen Dollhouse, but I just find the possible themes interesting.

You can read find out more about Never Let Me Go here.

{ 1 comment }

Dollhouse Canada

by Roco on May 29, 2008 · 2 comments

I’ve had a couple of people ask me whether Dollhouse will air in Canada, so I thought i’d post this just incase anyone else is wondering – the answer is YES! Canadian broadcaster CanWest picked up Dollhouse a few weeks ago. I don’t think it will be long before the top broadcasters in other countries get in on the act.

{ 2 comments }

Tahmoh Penikett – An Agent on the Hunt

Tahmoh Penikett – IMDB | Wikipedia

Snippet:

Whedon tapped Battlestar Galacticastud Tahmoh Penikett to stand in as Echo’s twisted love interest and an FBI agent obsessed with the urban myth of a such a “Dollhouse.” – Wired.com

 See Also: Eliza Dushku Profile

{ 0 comments }

At least there’s hope if FOX does cancel Dollhouse before it’s time. Perhaps it could continue in another form – comic-form to be precise. No, I’m not jumping the gun, I simply want to reference this interesting Whedon-related article, which talks about ‘Buffy’ and ‘Angel’ and how they have found new lives in a different medium. Interesting read here.

{ 9 comments }

More Dollhouse Set Photos

by Roco on May 28, 2008 · 2 comments

More pictures of the Dollhouse Set:

Dollhouse

Dollhouse

Dollhouse

Dollhouse

Dollhouse

You can’t quite see it with these photos, but the ones here certainly seem to have a circular theme – interesting because circles are often considered symbols of ‘unity’. A subliminal way to condition the dolls into believing that they are part of a ‘central organism’ (aka the Dollhouse programme), helping them to stay within the circle and to never stray with independent thoughts, beliefs, urges..?

Thanks to Dollmazing for the images.

{ 2 comments }

Joss WhedonIGN have released more snippets from a recent interview with Dollhouse creator Joss Whedon. He talks about his confidence in Dollhouse airing mid-season, Eliza Dushku, Amy Acker, Tahmoh Penikett, the projected lifespan of Dollhouse and other interesting DH reveals. It’s kind of spoilery, so be warned:

Question: Your fans are very protective of you. Some of them heard “midseason” and there was a bit of, “The sky is falling! FOX is going to screw him again!” What do you say to those concerns?

Whedon:

Well, you know, I get it. I understand that and I feel bad because I want to be able to explain, without sounding like an apologist, that it doesn’t work the way it used to. The winter is prime time for FOX. Firefly came out in the fall, had to fight baseball, and lost. FOX has always been incredibly supportive of [Dollhouse], and they also said, “Well, you haven’t finished it. These guys [at Fringe] have finished theirs.” And we were gunning for winter. We were like, “We hope we get January, because we want American Idol time, not baseball time.” Not to say that they’re not supporting Fringe, it’s just that either one works for different reasons. I like the idea of making my episodes before they go out – it’s how we did Buffyand it worked great for us. But yeah, for some people it has the stink of midseason, when in fact the whole concept of the season is deteriorating. So we’re going up with the premiere of 24.

Question: Do you have this close a friendship with a lot of the actors you’ve worked with, or do you think you and Eliza have something very specific?

Whedon:

You know, it’s different with everyone. Eliza and I aren’t as close as some, like Aly [Hannigan] and Amy [Acker]. They’re in my life day to day. I’m really close with Alexis Denisof. Eliza and I have seldom been in the same place for very long and I’m an old married guy and she’s a lot younger and bubblier. But we started this tradition, and it started years ago, where I got frustrated with all these crappy horror movies she was making like Wrong Turn and Soul Survivor… That last one broke me. I literally said, “Eliza, let’s have tea. I’d like to talk to you.” And I said, “I love you. I think you have something that no other actor that I’ve worked with has. What the f**k are you making these movies for? Why are you doing this to me? You’re killing me. I just think you’re better than this.” And that was when she was really struggling with her agency and her identity and not really knowing what she wanted, but she knew she wanted to. And it kind of became a tradition with us over the years. I saw her in New York doing a play off-Broadway and we sat until 2:00 in the morning talking about, “There’s this opportunity, and I’m trying to develop this.” I could see that she was taking it further. And this lunch was just one of those [situations]. We always checked in with each other with this, ‘Same time next year’ relationship. We hardly get to see each other and when we do, I adore her and I’m pretty sure she’s fairly okay with me.

Question: Can you talk about Amy Acker’s character?

Whedon:

Amy plays Dr. Claire Saunders. She works in the Dollhouse and she’s a very moral force and she’s very, very, very broken. She’s scarred. Something happened – she’s literally scarred. Something happened at the dollhouse awhile back and she was scarred and she just sort of lives there and her whole mission in life is to take care of them. Topher, the programmer, he programs them and has a very amoral kind of point of view, and she’s sort of his counterpoint.

Question: I know you’re a big Battlestarfan. Was it great for you to get to work with Tahmoh Penikett?

Whedon:I’m gonna go out on a limb here and tell the truth – I’ve had a man-crush on Tahmoh since the first episode of Battlestar.

Question: From the moment he stayed behind on Caprica?

Whedon:I had a feeling about him. I just had a feeling about him. I know, he gave up his seat to Baltar! Not bright, but cute! But no, he just has a presence. Tim Minear watched the dailies and he said, “I can’t believe you found this guy. This guy is so hard to find. A leading man that has a real soulfulness and a real unique quality” and I just felt that from Battlestar, and he brought it completely [to Dollhouse]. When I spoke to him, he was the first person to mention Never Let Me Go, the novel, just from hearing the premise of Dollhouse. The beautiful sadness of that novel so suffuses what we’re trying to do, and it was so beautiful when he brought it up that I just knew this guy [was right]. And it follows my rule with Nathan [Fillion]. Hire a Canadian! They’re gentlemen and they’re very tall.

Question: What exactly are the dolls used for? In the clips, one guy seems to be using Eliza for a date essentially, right?

Whedon: Well, they will. One of the things Eliza first talked to me about is the idea of sexuality being something she wanted to explore before I’d come up with a concept. And the idea of hiring what we refer to as “an active” – the dolls, basically – is that you get to have the perfect experience. And if we are going to stand here and say for as lot of people the perfect experience doesn’t involve sex, that would be disingenuous. So, there is an element of something about it that’s very romantic and there’s an element that’s very creepy. And the two things, what’s interesting to me, is that they’re joined. That need for that perfect moment – feeling love for somebody that’s simple and real and not something where they’re faking, because they’re not. She’ll fall in love with him. That’s how it works. Whether or not it has to do with sex, that’s how it works. That’s how she’s imprinted. But our need for something like that is sort of what’s worst about us and what’s best about us. What she ends up being in most cases is kind of a life coach; whether she’s coaching you through a criminal act or going into rehab, she’s the person you need to meet the most at that time and combining a very lofty sort of goal with what is considered by most people to be a very base part of us, sexuality, is what interests me, because there’s arguments for every side. There is arguments that that is degrading and there’s arguments that it’s uplifting and there’s arguments in different ways for both of those sides and that’s what we want to talk about.

Question: If you do six years of this show, do you know the end?

Whedon:

I don’t know the end zone, because you’ve got to leave that up to the viewers to an extent, but I know the arenas. When I pitched the show, I said, “Here’s the pilot, here are the characters, here’s episode six and sort of what we do every week and here’s the first two years, second two years, third two years.” So yes, because the show has to progress. Especially a show like this, where while it’s a week to week show – she’ll go on a different engagement every week and it’ll have a complete story – like Buffy, ultimately what people will become invested in is the arcs of the characters. You cannot just hit reset. Somebody, I forget who and I apologize to them in advance, but somebody said, “Scully was pretty much like a doll that they imprinted and she kept forgetting that there might be monsters.” You can’t do that. You have to let them grow. So I said, “The first arc is this, the second arc is this, the third is this.” There’s room for change though, but they know I have a five year plan and that’s important.

 

You can read the entire article here.

{ 1 comment }

Dollhouse ARG – Adelle’s Aware

by Roco on May 27, 2008 · 4 comments

Adelle has sent an email to her stooges and she’s not happy – apparently she’s aware that “civilians” are trying to find her “actives”:

All,

We may have a problem regarding one of the Actives.  It appears somebody — a civilian — is trying to find them.

My office, 9am.  Don’t be late.

I’m assuming that she’s referring to Sheridan (and us) who is looking for the ‘Dollhouse mole’Kimi Lassek. Does this mean that Kimi is an “active” - perhaps she is Echo’s sister? ..Maybe she’s the active called November (Miracle Laurie) who may want to expose the truth about Adelle’s unregulated science? Or perhaps the ARG wont tie-in directly with the actual show, and Kimi will just be an ARG character called Kimi – like Rachel Blakefrom Lost’s first ARG?

 

{ 4 comments }

Spoiler Warning!

The people over at pinkraygun.com have released ‘10 Facts About Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse’. Most of them are already fairly common knowledge by now, but I was further intrigued by these:

8. Most of the Dolls are young, and all beautiful.

9. Supposedly, the Dolls volunteered for the work in the Dollhouse — they give up five years of their lives, and at the end they receive a ridiculously large sum of money and no memory of anything they did for the Dollhouse.

10. Missions for the Actives are only supposed to last 10 hours, or else the imprint could be strained. However, lately certain missions have taken quite a bit longer, some lasting for days…

OK, some musings: So all of the Dolls are “beautiful” – what if a mission requires a less aesthetically pleasing Doll..wouldn’t this put the Dolls at a disadvantage..make them less convincing? What statement is this trying to make, I wonder.

The Dolls are only hired for 5 years? So they are released back into society afterwards? Does this mean their pre-Dollhouse memories are replaced..or are those wiped for ever? I also find the “large” monetary payoff interesting as well – I had assumed that the prime motivation for joining the Dollhouse was to rid themselves of past memories..but I guess money has to also be considered as a motivator, which paints some of the Dolls in a slightly different light. Although I guess they need money to live on after those 5 years, as re-integrating back into society could take some time.

Missions should only last 10 hours or the imprint begins to deteriorate – is this how Echo begins to become self-aware? Does she go on one too many missions which last more than 10 hours?

You can find all 10 “facts” here, although beware of spoilers if you REALLY don’t want to know.

{ 0 comments }

Dollhouse ARG: Find Kimi Lassek

by Roco on May 26, 2008 · 3 comments

Thanks to wisengrund for the heads up on this one – it seems that the ‘game’ has now moved to the next stage, with ‘finding Kimi’ being the next port of call. Check out this photo which was mysteriously sent to Sheridan Owen from Manchester, England (yes folks, this is a global game!):

From Kimi

It appears to be a photo from inside the Dollhouse facility. I’m not sure what other conclusions to make from it – although we’ll probably have to go back through the promo images which were released last week to make some connections.

As for “Kimi” and who she is – she’s Kimi Lassek, the guy/woman/doll who helped me crack Adelle’s website. But what is Kimi’s agenda?

{ 3 comments }

Flash Forward TV Series - Fringe Blog - Fringe Fox - Fringe Blog - FringeARG - True Blood - Watch True Blood - Watch True Blood Online